Chú thích, tham khảo, nguồn Ramesses VI

Chú thích

  1. The "C" in this name is not part of Ramesses VI's original Egyptian name, rather it is a denomination added in modern Egyptology to distinguish him from other people of the same name: Amenherkhepshef A, a son of Ramesses II, Amenherkhepshef B, a son of Ramesses III, and Amenherkhepshef D a son of Ramesses VI.
  2. That the relief was left unfinished with no text during Ramesses III's reign is indicated by the fact that the text refers to various princes as pharaoh and coincides with modification of the princes' figures to add royal attributes. In addition, all of the princesses are still lacking their names, which were never added.[9]
  3. Ramesses VI was the second prince to bear the name Amunherkhepeshef. Consequently, he is sometimes referred to as Amunherkhepeshef II in modern Egyptology.[4]
  4. The publication which led to the modern consensus on Ramesses VI's filiation is due to the Egyptologist Kenneth Kitchen, who offered a point by point rebuttal of the arguments hitherto advanced by Kurt Sethe and others to posit that Ramesses VI was a grandson of Ramesses III rather than his son. First, Kitchen rejects the initial interpretation of the titles borne by princes on the relief, in particular Sethe's reading of the title of "king's first born son" is provably wrong as several princes bore the title, which should be understood as "king's eldest surviving son". It follows that Sethe's rejection of princes Praherwonmefs as sons of Ramesses III is invalid and that the relief can present sons of this king.[14] Second Sethe rejected the filiation of Ramesses VI on the basis that it would be unlikely if not impossible that several sons of Ramesses III bore the same name, Amunherkhepeshef and therefore that the two mentions of this name on the relief refer to the same Ramesses VI, which would be suspect for a list of princes. Kitchen points out well-known examples, including princes Meryre I and II on a relief presenting sons of Ramesses II, showing that instead it was common for several sons of kings to bear the same name and thus that the two Amunherkhepeshef are distinct persons.[14] Third, Sethe thought it improbable that three sons of a ruler could have ascended the throne. Kitchen points out the short reigns of the rulers of the 20th Dynasty after Ramesses III, so that the proposed sons ruled within 20 years of their father's death, far from impossible.[15] Fourth, Kitchen points out the wrong argument that the cartouche next to Ramesses IV's figure simply reads Ramesses, which this ruler would have deemed insufficient to distinguish himself and thus that the figure is not Ramesses IV but someone else. As noted by Kitchen, the titles given to this figure are sufficient to identify Ramesses IV beyond doubt.[15] Fifth, Sethe and others believe that Ramesses VI implemented a damnatio memoriae against Ramesses IV and V, which they explain through complicated dynastic struggles. But this damnatio memoriae is, in the terms of Kitchen "wholly imaginary" and indeed archaeological evidence has since established that Ramesses VI only erased the cartouches of his predecessor to gain visibility for his, and not in any systematic manner.[15] Lastly, Sethe and Peet pointed out that in her tomb, Ramesses VI's mother is not given the title of king's wife and thus deduce that Ramesses VI was the son of a non-royal father. But Kitchen points out that this absence is no evidence, for example, Ramesses II's mother herself is never given the title of king's wife in her tomb, yet it is well established that she was Sethi I's queen.[16]
  5. The filiation of Panebenkemyt is established by a depiction of him on a statue of his father, now in the Luxor Museum.[18]
  6. If the hypothesis regarding Ramesses IX's filiation is correct, then Kitchen adds that queen Tyti might have been a daughter of Ramesses VI, the wife of Ramesses IX and mother of Ramesses X.[24] New evidence emerging from the publication of tomb-robbers accounts in 2010 established that Tyti was in fact the wife and sister of Ramesses III and possibly the mother of Ramesses IV.[25]
  7. Known today as Ostracon IFAO 1425.[39]
  8. That the king in question is Ramesses VI is established by the dates recorded on the ostracon. It is mentioned that the first loan occurred on Year 7, I Peret 18 (that is on the 18th day of the first month of the season of Peret in the king's 7th year of reign) while the second took place on Year 8, II Peret 11. Furthermore the short duration of the loans which amounted to 15 days strongly suggest that these dates occurred in immediate succession and thus that they belong to the same reign. This indicates that the king referred to had ascended the throne between the 18th day of the first month of Peret and the 11th day of the second month of the same season. But the only king of the 19th and 20th Dynasties who ascended the throne in such a time-frame is Ramesses VI.[38][39]
  9. While the exact date of Ramesses VI's coronation is unknown, ancient sources indicate that he must have started his reign in winter, between the 28th day of the first month of the Season of the Emergence and the 11th day the second month of the same season.[46][47] Janssen has more specifically argued for an accession of the eighth day of the second month of this season.[48]
  10. The location of Per-Nebyt is not known for certain. It may have been in north-Thebes.[3]
  11. Černý's argument is that the term employed in the source to refer to the enemy is not the term that would be employed for foreign marauders such as Libyans. As a consequence, he sees the trouble-makers as Egyptians. Since furthermore the chief of the Medjay of Thebes seems not to have been involved in fighting the enemy, Černý believes that the troubles came from the North. Černý further conjectures that the civil war was a struggle between followers of Ramesses V and Ramesses VI, whom he sees as antagonists.[50] Against this hypothesis is the observation that several high-officials continued their careers without disturbances from the time of Ramesses III until that of Ramesses VI and beyond, suggesting that the state was in fact politically stable.[3]
  12. This is indicated by a text on the verso of Ostracon Berlin P. 12654, which reads "So says the vizier: leave these sixty men here in the gang, whomsoever you choose, and send the rest away. Order that they should become conscript labour who carry [supplies] for you."[50]
  13. Tombs dating to the Twentieth Dynasty but which cannot be securely attributed to any specific reign are QV 24, 41, 45, 50, 54, 84, 85, 86. This list may include those built by Ramesses VI.[58]
  14. Small artefacts bearing Ramesses VI's cartouches are also known, including bronze and gold signet rings now in the collection of the Metropolitan Museum of Arts.[69]
  15. The statue was found in the Karnak cache and is now in the Egyptian Museum, under the catalogue number 42153.[74]
  16. Also called Mentemtowy in the modern literature.[78]
  17. The finds of the statue and scarab in Megiddo and Alalakh do not necessarily denote any strong Egyptian presence there as these kinds of artefacts were widely traded throughout the Mediterranean at the time.[78]
  18. The other renditions are found in the tomb of Seti I and in the Osireion.[104]
  19. That is most of the decorations of the temple that have survived to this day have been made under Ramesses VI as shown by the presence of his cartouches on these decorations.[111]

Tham khảo

  1. 1 2 Clayton 1994, tr. 167.
  2. 1 2 3 4 Leprohon 2013, tr. 199.
  3. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Amer 1985, tr. 67.
  4. 1 2 3 4 5 6 Grimal 1992, tr. 288.
  5. Grandet 2014, tr. 1.
  6. Seele 1960, tr. 184.
  7. 1 2 Kitchen 1982, tr. 120.
  8. Seele 1960, tr. 186–187, Plate I & 2.
  9. 1 2 3 Murnane 1971, tr. 121.
  10. Murnane 1971, tr. 125.
  11. Murnane 1971, tr. 122.
  12. Murnane 1971, tr. 131.
  13. Seele 1960, tr. 204.
  14. 1 2 Kitchen 1982, tr. 121.
  15. 1 2 3 Kitchen 1982, tr. 122.
  16. 1 2 Kitchen 1982, tr. 123.
  17. Demas & Neville 2016b, tr. 307.
  18. 1 2 3 4 Dodson & Hilton 2004, tr. 193.
  19. Bács 1995, tr. 7–11.
  20. Dodson & Hilton 2004, tr. 190.
  21. Kitchen 1972, tr. 182.
  22. Harris & Wente 1980, tr. 153.
  23. von Beckerath 1971, tr. 7.
  24. 1 2 Kitchen 1982, tr. 125.
  25. Collier, Dodson & Hamernik 2010, tr. 242–247.
  26. Dodson & Hilton 2004, tr. 191.
  27. Dodson & Hilton 2004, tr. 194.
  28. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Vinson 2001, tr. 120–121.
  29. Encyclopædia Britannica 2018.
  30. von Beckerath 1999, tr. 190.
  31. Hornung 2012, tr. 475.
  32. Grimal 1992, tr. 204–205 & 393.
  33. Demas & Neville 2016a, tr. 119.
  34. Shaw 2000, tr. 485.
  35. 1 2 3 4 van Dijk 2000, tr. 300.
  36. 1 2 Rice 1999, tr. 167.
  37. Burke et al. 2017, tr. 87.
  38. 1 2 Wente & Van Siclen 1977, tr. 243–245.
  39. 1 2 3 Janssen 1978, tr. 45–46.
  40. 1 2 Bell 1980, tr. 16.
  41. Bierbrier 1972, tr. 195–199.
  42. Peden 2001a, tr. 201.
  43. Ventura 1983, tr. 271.
  44. Ventura 1983, tr. 276.
  45. 1 2 Clayton 1994, tr. 168.
  46. Hornung 2012, tr. 215.
  47. von Beckerath 1984, tr. 7.
  48. Janssen 1997, tr. 131–138.
  49. 1 2 Amer 1985, tr. 66.
  50. 1 2 3 4 5 Černý 1975, tr. 613.
  51. 1 2 Kitchen 1972, tr. 193.
  52. Legrain 1909, tr. 17–19 & 75, pl. XV.
  53. Peden 2001b, tr. 83–88.
  54. 1 2 Yurco 1999, tr. 294.
  55. Grimal 1992, tr. 278.
  56. 1 2 Leblanc 1999, tr. 1021.
  57. Demas & Neville 2016b, tr. 312.
  58. 1 2 Demas & Neville 2016b, tr. 143.
  59. Peden 2001a, tr. 223.
  60. Brescinani và đồng nghiệp 1993, tr. 85.
  61. 1 2 Amer 1985, tr. 68.
  62. 1 2 3 Hovestreydt 1997, tr. 108.
  63. Hovestreydt 1997, tr. 114.
  64. Hovestreydt 1997, tr. 121.
  65. 1 2 3 4 Amer 1985, tr. 69.
  66. Lobban 2004, tr. 34.
  67. Bianchi 2004, tr. 143.
  68. 1 2 Brugsch 1859, tr. 203.
  69. 1 2 3 Hayes 1978, tr. 375.
  70. Saleh 1981, tr. 43–57.
  71. Janssen 1975, tr. 551–552.
  72. Brand 2010, see figs. 6 & 7 p. 3, fig. 8 p. 4, text p. 6.
  73. Peden 1989, tr. 41–46.
  74. 1 2 Kitchen 1972, tr. 190.
  75. 1 2 3 Kitchen 1972, tr. 192.
  76. Brugsch 1859, tr. 202.
  77. 1 2 Amer 1985, tr. 70.
  78. 1 2 3 4 5 6 Černý 1975, tr. 614.
  79. 1 2 3 Peden 2001a, tr. 132.
  80. Rice 1999, tr. 149.
  81. Černý 1975, tr. 627.
  82. 1 2 3 4 5 Polz 1998, tr. 292.
  83. Černý 1975, tr. 628.
  84. Polz 1998, tr. 291.
  85. Polz 1998, tr. 293.
  86. Mumford 1999, tr. 885.
  87. Kitchen 1983, tr. 279.
  88. Kitchen 1983, tr. 278.
  89. 1 2 Hayes 1978, tr. 371.
  90. Breasted 1948.
  91. Ussishkin 1995.
  92. Mazar 1990, tr. 296–297.
  93. 1 2 Peden 2001a, tr. 130.
  94. Burke et al. 2017, tr. 85 & 128–129.
  95. Burke et al. 2017, tr. 85.
  96. Cohen 2016, tr. 7.
  97. 1 2 Grandet 2014, tr. 10.
  98. 1 2 Černý 1975, tr. 632.
  99. de Morgan 1893, p. 93 numb 132.
  100. Černý 1975, tr. 612.
  101. Černý 1975, tr. 611.
  102. Dodson 1999, tr. 1048.
  103. 1 2 Weeks 1999, tr. 1016.
  104. 1 2 3 Brock 1999, tr. 384.
  105. Peden 2001a, tr. 205.
  106. Grimal 1992, tr. 290.
  107. Grimal 1992, tr. 291.
  108. Loret 1899.
  109. Nasrawi 2004.
  110. Murnane 1999, tr. 997.
  111. 1 2 Hayes 1978, tr. 372.

Nguồn

Amer, Amin A. M. A. (1985). “Reflections on the reign of Ramesses VI”. The Journal of Egyptian Archaeology 71: 66–70. JSTOR 3821712. Bács, Tamás A. (1995). “A Note on the Divine Adoratrix Isis, daughter of Ramesses VI”. Göttinger Miszellen 148: 7–11. Bell, Lanny David (1980). “Only one High Priest Ramessenakht and the second prophet Nesamun his younger son”. Serapis 6: 7–16. Bianchi, Robert Steven (2004). Daily life of the Nubians. Greenwood Press "Daily life through history" series. Westport, Conn.: Greenwood Press. ISBN 978-0-31-332501-4. Bierbrier, M.L. (1972). “A Second High Priest Ramessesnakht?”. The Journal of Egyptian Archaeology 58: 195–199. JSTOR 3856249. Brand, Peter (2010). “Usurpation of Monuments”. Trong Grajetzki, Wolfram; Wendrich, Willeke. UCLA Encyclopedia of Egyptology. Los Angeles: University of California Los Angeles. Breasted, James Henry (1948). Bronze base of a statue of Ramses VI discovered at Megiddo. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. OCLC 83774290. Brescinani, Edda; Donadoni, Sergio; Guidotti, Maria-Cristina; Leospo, Enrichetta; Leclant, Jean (1993). L'Egypte antique illustrée de Champollion et Rosellini (bằng tiếng Pháp). Paris: Citadelles Mazenod.  Bảo trì CS1: Ngôn ngữ không rõ (link)Brock, Edwin C. (1999). “Funerary texts”. Trong Bard, Kathryn; Shubert, Stephen Blake. Encyclopedia of the archaeology of ancient Egypt. London; New York: Routledge. tr. 382–385. ISBN 978-0-203-98283-9Brugsch, Heinrich Karl (1859). Histoire d'Égypte dès les premiers temps de son existence jusqu'à nos jours (bằng tiếng Pháp). Leipzig: J. C. Hinrichs. OCLC 23425377.  Bảo trì CS1: Ngôn ngữ không rõ (link)Burke, Aaron A.; Peilstöcker, Martin; Karoll, Amy; Pierce, George A.; Kowalski, Krister; Ben-Marzouk, Nadia; Damm, Jacob C.; Danielson, Andrew J.; Fessler, Heidi D.; Kaufman, Brett; Pierce, Krystal V.L.; Höflmayer, Felix; Damiata, Brian N.; Dee, Michael (2017). “Excavations of the New Kingdom Fortress in Jaffa, 2011–2014: Traces of Resistance to Egyptian Rule in Canaan”. American Journal of Archaeology 121 (1): 85–133. JSTOR 10.3764/aja.121.1.0085. doi:10.3764/aja.121.1.0085. Černý, Jaroslav (1975). “Egypt: from the death of Ramesses III to the end of the Twenty-First Dynasty”. Trong Edwards, Iorwerth Eiddon Stephen; Gadd, Cyril John; Hammond, Nicholas Geoffrey Lemprière và đồng nghiệp. The Cambridge Ancient History II part 2. The Middle East and the Aegean Region c. 1380—1000 B.C. (ấn bản 3). Cambridge: Cambridge university press. tr. 606–657. ISBN 978-0-52-108691-2.  Gợi ý |số biên tập viên= (trợ giúp)Clayton, Peter (1994). Chronicle of the Pharaohs. London: Thames & Hudson. ISBN 978-0-500-05074-3. Cohen, Susan (2016). “History of Egypt in Palestine”. Trong Grajetzki, Wolfram; Wendrich, Willeke. UCLA Encyclopedia of Egyptology. Los Angeles: University of California Los Angeles. Collier, Mark; Dodson, Aidan; Hamernik, Gottfried (2010). P. BM 10052, Anthony Harris and Queen Tyti. Journal of Egyptian Archaeology 96. tr. 242–247. Demas, Martha; Neville, Agnew biên tập (13 tháng 3 năm 2020). Valley of the Queens Assessment Report: A Collaborative Project of the Getty Conservation Institute and the Supreme Council of Antiquities, Egypt. Vol. 1, Conservation and Management Planning. Los Angeles: Getty Conservation Institute. ISBN 978-1-93-743336-9. Demas, Martha; Neville, Agnew biên tập (13 tháng 3 năm 2020). Valley of the Queens Assessment Report: A Collaborative Project of the Getty Conservation Institute and the Supreme Council of Antiquities, Egypt. Vol. 2, Assessment of 18th, 19th, and 20th Dynasty Tombs. Los Angeles: Getty Conservation Institute. ISBN 978-1-93-743336-9Dodson, Aidan (1999). “Tutankhamen, tomb of”. Trong Bard, Kathryn; Shubert, Stephen Blake. Encyclopedia of the archaeology of ancient Egypt. London; New York: Routledge. tr. 1044–1048. ISBN 978-0-203-98283-9. Dodson, Aidan; Hilton, Dyan (2004). The Complete Royal Families of Ancient Egypt. London: Thames & Hudson Ltd. ISBN 978-0-500-05128-3de Morgan, Jacques (1893). Catalogue des monuments et inscriptions de l'Égypte antique / Sér. 1, Haute Égypte. 1, De la frontière de la Nubie à Kom Ombos. Leipzig: Direction Générale du Service des Antiquités. OCLC 312439542Grandet, Pierre (2014). “Early to Mid-20th Dynasty”. Trong Grajetzki, Wolfram; Wendrich, Willeke. UCLA Encyclopedia of Egyptology. Los Angeles: University of California Los Angeles. Grimal, Nicolas (1992). A History of Ancient Egypt. Translated by Ian Shaw. Hoboken, New Jersey: Wiley-Blackwell publishing. ISBN 978-0-631-19396-8. Harris, James E; Wente, Edward Frank (1980). An x-ray atlas of the royal mummies. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. OCLC 9399981Hayes, William (1978). The Scepter of Egypt: A Background for the Study of the Egyptian Antiquities in The Metropolitan Museum of Art. Vol. 2, The Hyksos Period and the New Kingdom (1675–1080 B.C.). New York: Metropolitan Museum of Art. OCLC 7427345Hornung, Erik; Krauss, Rolf; Warburton, David biên tập (2012). Ancient Egyptian Chronology. Handbook of Oriental Studies. Leiden, Boston: Brill. ISBN 978-90-04-11385-5. ISSN 0169-9423. Hovestreydt, Willem (1997). “A Letter to the King Relating to the Foundation of a Statue (P. Turin 1879 vso.)”. Lingua Aegyptia (Hamburg: Widmaier Verlag) 5: 107–121. Janssen, Jac J. (1975). Commodity prices from the Ramessid period: an economic study of the village of Necropolis workmen at Thebes. Leiden: E. J. Brill. ISBN 978-9-00-404211-7. .Janssen, Jac J. (1978). “Year 8 of Ramesses VI Attested”. Göttinger Miszellen 29. Janssen, Jac J. (1997). Village varia. Ten studies on the history and administration of Deir el-Medina. Egyptologische uitgaven 11. Leiden: Nederlands Inst. voor het Nabije Oosten. ISBN 978-9-06-258211-2Kitchen, Kenneth Anderson (1972). “Ramesses VII and the Twentieth Dynasty”. The Journal of Egyptian Archaeology 58: 182–194. JSTOR 3856248. Kitchen, Kenneth Anderson (1982). “The Twentieth Dynasty Revisited”. The Journal of Egyptian Archaeology 68: 116–125. JSTOR 3821630. Kitchen, Kenneth Anderson (1983). Ramesside inscriptions: historical and biographical. Vol. VI. [Ramesses IV to XI and Contemporaries]. Oxford: B.H. Blackwell. OCLC 866782570. Leblanc, Christian (1999). “Thebes, Valley of the Queens”. Trong Bard, Kathryn; Shubert, Stephen Blake. Encyclopedia of the archaeology of ancient Egypt. London; New York: Routledge. tr. 1020–1023. ISBN 978-0-203-98283-9Legrain, Georges (1909). Catalogue Général des antiquités égyptiennes du musée du Caire. Nos: 42192-42250. Statues et statuettes de rois et de particuliers. Tome second (PDF) (bằng tiếng Pháp). Le Caire: Institut français d'archéologie orientale. OCLC 729119833. Leprohon, Ronald J. (2013). The great name: ancient Egyptian royal titulary. Writings from the ancient world, no. 33. Atlanta: Society of Biblical Literature. ISBN 978-1-58983-736-2Lobban, Richard Andrew Jr. (2004). Historical dictionary of ancient and medieval Nubia. Historical dictionaries of ancient civilizations and historical eras 10. Lanham, Md.: Scarecrow Press. ISBN 978-0-81-084784-2Loret, Victor (1899). “Le tombeau d'Aménophis II et la cachette royale de Biban el-Molouk”. Bulletin de l'Institut Egyptien (bằng tiếng Pháp) 3. Le Caire. tr. 98–112. OCLC 469908038.  Bảo trì CS1: Ngôn ngữ không rõ (link)Mazar, Amihai (1990). Freedman, D.N., biên tập. Archaeology of the Land of the Bible 10,000–586 BCE. Anchor Bible reference library (ấn bản 1). New Haven, Conn.; London: Yale University Press. ISBN 978-0-30-014179-5. Mumford, G. J. (1999). “Serabit el-Khadim”. Trong Bard, Kathryn; Shubert, Stephen Blake. Encyclopedia of the archaeology of ancient Egypt. London; New York: Routledge. tr. 881–885. ISBN 978-0-203-98283-9Murnane, Wiliam J. (1971). “The "King Ramesses" of the Medinet Habu Procession of Princes”. Journal of the American Research Center in Egypt 9: 121–131. JSTOR 40001059. Murnane, Wiliam J. (1999). “Thebes, royal funerary temples”. Trong Bard, Kathryn; Shubert, Stephen Blake. Encyclopedia of the archaeology of ancient Egypt. London; New York: Routledge. tr. 995–1000. ISBN 978-0-203-98283-9. Nasrawi, Salah (22 tháng 3 năm 2004). “Pharaoh's sarcophagus reassembled at last”. Bản gốc lưu trữ ngày 28 tháng 3 năm 2018. Truy cập ngày 28 tháng 3 năm 2018. Peden, Alexander (1989). “The usurped stela of Ramesses V”. Göttinger Miszellen: Beiträge zur ägyptologischen Diskussion 110: 41–46. Peden, Alexander J. (13 tháng 3 năm 2020). The graffiti of Pharaonic Egypt: scope and roles of informal writings (c 3100-332 B.C.). Probleme der Ägyptologie 17. Leiden; Boston; Köln: Brill. ISBN 978-9-00-412112-6. Peden, Alexander J. (13 tháng 3 năm 2020). “Where Did Ramesses VI Bury his Nephew?”. Göttinger Miszellen 181: 83–88. ISSN 0344-385X. Polz, Daniel (1998). “The Ramsesnakht Dynasty and the Fall of the New Kingdom: A New Monument in Thebes”. Studien zur Altägyptischen Kultur (Hamburg: Helmut Buske Verlag GmbH) 25: 257–293. JSTOR 25152764“Ramses VI”. Encyclopædia Britannica. Truy cập ngày 8 tháng 3 năm 2018. Rice, Michael (1999). Who is who in Ancient Egypt. Routledge London & New York. ISBN 978-0-203-44328-6. Saleh, Abdel-Aziz (1981). Excavations at Heliopolis Ancient Egyptian Ounû. vol. I, (The Site of Tell el-Hisn-Matarîyah). Cairo: Cairo University Faculty of Archaeology. OCLC 493125900. Seele, Keith Cedric (1960). “Ramesses VI and the Medinet Habu Procession of the Princes”. Journal of Near Eastern Studies 19 (3): 184–204. JSTOR 543775Shaw, Ian (2000). “Chronology”. Trong Shaw, Ian. The Oxford History of Ancient Egypt. Oxford: Oxford University Press. tr. 480–489. ISBN 978-0-19-815034-3Ussishkin, David (1995). “The Destruction of Megiddo at the End of the Late Bronze Age and Its Historical Significance”. Tel Aviv 22 (2): 265–307. van Dijk, Jacobus (2000). “The Amarna Period and the Later New Kingdom (c.1352–1069 BC)”. Trong Shaw, Ian. The Oxford History of Ancient Egypt. Oxford: Oxford University Press. tr. 265–489. ISBN 978-0-19-815034-3. Ventura, Raphael (1983). “More Chronological Evidence from Turin Papyrus Cat.1907+1908”. Journal of Near Eastern Studies (Chicago: The University of Chicago Press) 42 (4): 271–277. JSTOR 544539. Vinson, Steve (2001). “Ramses VI”. Trong Redford, Donald B. The Oxford Encyclopedia of Ancient Egypt, Volume 3. Oxford: Oxford University Press. tr. 120–121. ISBN 978-0-19-510234-5von Beckerath, Jürgen (1971). “Ein Denkmal zur Genealogie der XX. Dynastie”. Zeitschrift für Ägyptische Sprache und Altertumskunde (bằng tiếng Đức) 79 (1): 7–12. ISSN 0044-216X.  Bảo trì CS1: Ngôn ngữ không rõ (link)von Beckerath, Jürgen (1984). “Drei Thronbesteigungsdaten der XX. Dynastie”. Göttinger Miszellen (bằng tiếng Đức) 79: 7–10.  Bảo trì CS1: Ngôn ngữ không rõ (link)von Beckerath, Jürgen (1999). Handbuch der ägyptischen Königsnamen. Münchner ägyptologische Studien (bằng tiếng Đức) 49. Mainz: Philip von Zabern. tr. 190. ISBN 978-3-8053-2591-2.  Bảo trì CS1: Ngôn ngữ không rõ (link)Weeks, Kent R. (1999). “Thebes, Valley of the Kings”. Trong Bard, Kathryn; Shubert, Stephen Blake. Encyclopedia of the archaeology of ancient Egypt. London; New York: Routledge. tr. 1013–1018. ISBN 978-0-203-98283-9Wente, Edward Frank; Van Siclen, Charles Cornell III (1977). “A Chronology of the New Kingdom”. Trong Johnson, J. H.; Wente, E. F. Studies in Honor of George R. Hughes, January 12, 1977. Studies in Ancient Oriental Civilization (SAOC) 39. Chicago: The Oriental Institute. tr. 217–262. ISBN 0-918986-01-XYurco, Frank J. (1999). “Deir el-Medina”. Trong Bard, Kathryn; Shubert, Stephen Blake. Encyclopedia of the archaeology of ancient Egypt. London; New York: Routledge. tr. 292–295. ISBN 978-0-203-98283-9
Wikimedia Commons có thêm hình ảnh và phương tiện truyền tải về Ramesses VI.

Tài liệu tham khảo

WikiPedia: Ramesses VI http://www.nbcnews.com/id/4579973/ns/technology_an... http://digi.ub.uni-heidelberg.de/diglit/bie1898/01... http://catalogue.bnf.fr/ark:/12148/cb11944862d http://data.bnf.fr/ark:/12148/cb11944862d http://www.cfeetk.cnrs.fr/fichiers/Documents/Resso... http://id.loc.gov/authorities/names/n83226630 http://d-nb.info/gnd/11859818X http://hdl.handle.net/10020/gci_pubs/valley_queens http://isni-url.oclc.nl/isni/0000000448872641 //dx.doi.org/10.3764%2Faja.121.1.0085